According to Houser and Kloesel (Eds.), The Essential Peirce, vol. 1 (Bloomington: Indiana, 1992), p. 56, in this paper, "Peirce works out a rationale for the objective validity of the laws of logic and, by linking epistemology with a social theory of logic, grounds induction in altruistic sentiments. He also discusses a version of the liar paradox and offers a solution based on the supposition that 'every proposition asserts its own truth,' and he makes his first published reference to De Morgan's work on the logic of relations."
]]>Grounds of Validity of the Laws of Logic: Further Consequences of Four Incapacities
First published in the Journal of Speculative Philosophy, vol. 2 (1869): 193-208, this paper is the third and final installment of a series of three that appeared in the same journal during the period 1868-1869.
According to Houser and Kloesel (Eds.), The Essential Peirce, vol. 1 (Bloomington: Indiana, 1992), p. 56, in this paper, "Peirce works out a rationale for the objective validity of the laws of logic and, by linking epistemology with a social theory of logic, grounds induction in altruistic sentiments. He also discusses a version of the liar paradox and offers a solution based on the supposition that 'every proposition asserts its own truth,' and he makes his first published reference to De Morgan's work on the logic of relations."
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1839-1914)
Journal of Speculative Philosophy, vol. 2 (1869): 193-208
1869
English
Text
According to Houser and Kloesel (Eds.), The Essential Peirce, vol. 1 (Bloomington: Indiana, 1992), p. 186, in this paper, "Peirce continues his 'Illustrations' [series] with a discussion of the three kinds of reasoning (deduction, induction, hypothesis) based on the general form of syllogistic argument composed of rule, case, and result. With examples from the history of science, he demonstrates that hypothesis is different from induction proper."
]]>Deduction, Induction, and Hypothesis
Originally published in the Popular Science Monthly, vol. 13 (August 1878): 470-482. This is the sixth and final installment of six papers in Peirce's "Illustrations of the Logic of Science" series.
According to Houser and Kloesel (Eds.), The Essential Peirce, vol. 1 (Bloomington: Indiana, 1992), p. 186, in this paper, "Peirce continues his 'Illustrations' [series] with a discussion of the three kinds of reasoning (deduction, induction, hypothesis) based on the general form of syllogistic argument composed of rule, case, and result. With examples from the history of science, he demonstrates that hypothesis is different from induction proper."
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1839-1914)
Popular Science Monthly, vol. 12 (August 1878): 470-482
1878-08
English
Text
According to Houser and Kloesel (Eds.), The Essential Peirce, vol. 1 (Bloomington: Indiana, 1992), p. 170, in this paper, "Peirce argues against Mill's view that the uniformity of nature is the sole warrant for induction and ... that induction should be explained by the doctrine of probabilities."
]]>The Order of Nature
Originally published in the Popular Science Monthly, vol. 12 (June 1878): 203-217. This is the fifth installment of six papers in Peirce's "Illustrations of the Logic of Science" series.
According to Houser and Kloesel (Eds.), The Essential Peirce, vol. 1 (Bloomington: Indiana, 1992), p. 170, in this paper, "Peirce argues against Mill's view that the uniformity of nature is the sole warrant for induction and ... that induction should be explained by the doctrine of probabilities."
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1839-1914)
Popular Science Monthly, vol. 12 (June 1878): 203-217
1878-06
English
Text